What are your tough about this ?
ex http://www.bodybuilding.com/store/ultra/hgc.html
HGH Supplementation ?
Moderators: Boss Man, cassiegose
Not worth it.
IGF-1 is already produced by the body, in relation to Growth Hormone production.
I also don't believe the claim you get no adverse side affects. You might still get side effects anyway. The fact they might class an adverse side effect, (if indeed they do), as something like little hard Testes or Gynocomastia, doesn't mean it's side effect free, and tehy don't say what such adverse effects with other similar products actually are.
They might have decided in their own belief, something like headaches or something like that, is not "adverse".
Frankly I don't believe taking GH, is necessarily side effect free, and in some cases probably unsafe even in safe use.
So no, I repeat, not worth it, especially not for that limited 50% off deal, which almost certainly will go back up in the next 4-8 weeks to full price.
IGF-1 is already produced by the body, in relation to Growth Hormone production.
I also don't believe the claim you get no adverse side affects. You might still get side effects anyway. The fact they might class an adverse side effect, (if indeed they do), as something like little hard Testes or Gynocomastia, doesn't mean it's side effect free, and tehy don't say what such adverse effects with other similar products actually are.
They might have decided in their own belief, something like headaches or something like that, is not "adverse".
Frankly I don't believe taking GH, is necessarily side effect free, and in some cases probably unsafe even in safe use.
So no, I repeat, not worth it, especially not for that limited 50% off deal, which almost certainly will go back up in the next 4-8 weeks to full price.
What's about the good side ? Do you think it would really help ? For someone who's diet perfect and training ? In therm of strength muscle/fat ratio etc.Boss Man wrote:Not worth it.
IGF-1 is already produced by the body, in relation to Growth Hormone production.
I also don't believe the claim you get no adverse side affects. You might still get side effects anyway. The fact they might class an adverse side effect, (if indeed they do), as something like little hard Testes or Gynocomastia, doesn't mean it's side effect free, and tehy don't say what such adverse effects with other similar products actually are.
They might have decided in their own belief, something like headaches or something like that, is not "adverse".
Frankly I don't believe taking GH, is necessarily side effect free, and in some cases probably unsafe even in safe use.
So no, I repeat, not worth it, especially not for that limited 50% off deal, which almost certainly will go back up in the next 4-8 weeks to full price.
after you finished them then what do you do? why not just increase it naturally?
www.uponlinetraining.com
www.uponlinetraining.com
In respect of a good diet and training regime, it still doesn't negate the possible side effects, and the argument that it is an unnecessary product.
The only thing it would help is increase that sites profits. You could get the results with a GH product, but what you have to think about is, you might get the resulrs a bit quicker, but thn nshould you be trying to make your body achieve accellerated results like that, when it has a perfectly normal way of it doing it anyway?
Like trying to accellerate fat loss with Thermos, it makes logical sense, if the body can positively change in a normal exercise and dietary situation, why would you want to force it, to perform beyond what could be seen as a safe rate?
You'll potentially end up paying for it physically in the long run.
The only thing it would help is increase that sites profits. You could get the results with a GH product, but what you have to think about is, you might get the resulrs a bit quicker, but thn nshould you be trying to make your body achieve accellerated results like that, when it has a perfectly normal way of it doing it anyway?
Like trying to accellerate fat loss with Thermos, it makes logical sense, if the body can positively change in a normal exercise and dietary situation, why would you want to force it, to perform beyond what could be seen as a safe rate?
You'll potentially end up paying for it physically in the long run.